Jaminan Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Terperiksa/Tersangka dari Intimidasi dan Penyiksaan dalam Proses Penyidikan

Authors

  • Rasdiyanah Rasdiyanah IAIN Parepare
  • Aftar Akbar IAIN Parepare
  • Aulia Ramadhani IAIN Parepare

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37481/jmh.v6i2.2077

Keywords:

Criminal Investigation, Torture Prevention, Legal Protection, Due Process, Investigative Interviewing

Abstract

This study addresses the persistent problem of intimidation and torture during criminal investigations, which undermines human dignity, the presumption of innocence, and the right to a fair trial. Despite existing legal safeguards, such practices continue to occur, indicating a gap between normative regulations and law enforcement practices. This research aims to identify the factors contributing to coercive interrogation methods and to formulate an accountable, human rights-based examination model. The study employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, supported by primary legal materials and relevant case analyses. The findings reveal that coercion is driven by confession-oriented investigative culture, unequal power relations, limited early access to legal counsel, lack of objective documentation, closed interrogation settings, and weak external oversight. To address these issues, this study proposes an integrated examination model based on five principles: recording, rights protection, rapport-based interviewing, review mechanisms, and effective remedies. This model is expected to prevent false confessions, strengthen evidentiary reliability, and enhance accountability in criminal investigations.

References

Arief, B. N. (2021). Pembaruan sistem peradilan pidana dalam perspektif keadilan. Jurnal Hukum Pidana dan Kriminologi, 12(1), 1-15.

Bull, R., & Baker, D. (2020). Obtaining reliable information from suspects. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(3), 273-278.

Davis, D., Leo, R. A., & Follette, W. C. (2021). Interrogation practices and false confessions. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 17, 45-63.

Fair Trials. (2021). Protecting the right to a fair trial in criminal proceedings. Fair Trials International.

Griffiths, A., & Milne, R. (2021). The application of the PEACE model of investigative interviewing. Journal of Investigative Psychology and Offender Profiling, 18(2), 95-110.

Gudjonsson, G. H. (2021). The psychology of false confessions: Forty years of science and practice. Psychology, Crime & Law, 27(2), 123-145.

Hadjarati, H., & Santoso, B. (2021). Diskresi aparat penegak hukum dalam perspektif negara hukum. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 28(3), 421-435.

Hidayat, A. (2023). Transparansi dalam proses penyidikan pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal RechtsVinding, 12(2), 215-230.

Hutchinson, T., & Duncan, N. (2019). Defining and describing what we do: Doctrinal legal research. Deakin Law Review, 24(1), 83-119.

Irfan, M., & Wahyudi, T. (2022). Akses bantuan hukum bagi tersangka dalam proses penyidikan. Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, 29(1), 45-60.

Jackson, J. (2019). Police interrogation and procedural justice. Current Issues in Criminal Justice, 31(2), 123-139.

Kassin, S. M. (2020). The psychology of confessions. Annual Review of Law and Social Science, 16, 83-102.

Kelly, C. E., Miller, J. C., & Redlich, A. D. (2019). The benefits of a rapport-based approach to investigative interviewing. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law, 26(6), 901-915.

Maskaly, J., Donner, C., & Jennings, W. G. (2021). The impact of body-worn cameras on police accountability. Police Quarterly, 24(2), 123-145.

Meissner, C. A., Redlich, A. D., Bhatt, S., & Brandon, S. (2019). Interview and interrogation methods and their effects on true and false confessions. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 15(1-2), 1-53.

Murray, D., O’Donnell, I., & McAuley, F. (2020). Criminal process and human rights. Cambridge University Press.

Nowak, M. (2019). Torture and ill-treatment in the criminal justice system. University of Pennsylvania Press.

Prasetyo, T. (2020). Keadilan dalam sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 9(2), 133-150.

Redlich, A. D., Kelly, C. E., & Miller, J. C. (2020). Interrogation and wrongful convictions. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 38(2), 165-181.

Roberts, P., & Hunter, J. (2020). Criminal evidence and human rights. International Journal of Evidence & Proof, 24(4), 345-362.

Siregar, R. (2021). Budaya pengakuan dalam penyidikan pidana di Indonesia. Jurnal Yudisial, 14(3), 345-360.

Smith, T. (2020). Coercive interrogation and human rights. Human Rights Law Review, 20(1), 45-67.

Smits, J. M. (2020). What is legal doctrine? On the aims and methods of legal-dogmatic research. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 27(2), 1-12.

Summers, S. (2019). Fair trials and the rule of law. Legal Studies, 39(3), 1-20.

Webley, L. (2020). Legal writing and research methodology. Routledge Handbook of Socio-Legal Theory and Methods, 45-58.

Downloads

Published

2026-05-01

How to Cite

Rasdiyanah, R., Akbar, A., & Ramadhani, A. (2026). Jaminan Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Terperiksa/Tersangka dari Intimidasi dan Penyiksaan dalam Proses Penyidikan. AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis, 6(2), 999–1010. https://doi.org/10.37481/jmh.v6i2.2077