Pengaruh Capital Intencity dan Komite Audit terhadap Agretivitas Pajak
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37481/jmh.v6i2.1940Keywords:
Tax Aggressiveness, Capital Intensity, Audit Committee, Political Connections, Energy CompaniesAbstract
Taxes represent a significant cost for companies and directly affect profitability and firm value, encouraging managers to seek strategies that reduce tax burdens. This condition has raised concerns regarding tax aggressiveness, particularly in capital-intensive and highly regulated industries such as the energy sector. This study aims to provide empirical evidence on the influence of capital intensity, the audit committee, and political connections on tax aggressiveness in energy companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange (IDX). Using a quantitative associative research design, the study examines 13 energy companies observed over the 2019–2023 period, resulting in 65 firm-year observations selected through purposive sampling. Secondary data were analyzed using Microsoft Excel and EViews 13. The analytical procedures included descriptive statistics, model selection tests, and classical assumption tests, coefficient of determination analysis, panel data regression, as well as F-tests and t-tests. The results indicate that firm characteristics and corporate governance mechanisms collectively play an important role in shaping corporate tax behavior. Capital intensity is associated with lower levels of tax aggressiveness, suggesting that higher fixed-asset investment increases transparency and regulatory scrutiny. The audit committee variable shows a tendency to encourage more aggressive tax planning, possibly reflecting greater managerial confidence in managing tax risks. In contrast, political connections do not appear to significantly influence tax aggressiveness, implying that regulatory enforcement reduces their effectiveness. Overall, this study contributes to the literature by clarifying inconsistent prior findings and highlighting the role of internal governance in corporate tax decisions.
References
Alafiah, N., Fitrios, R., & Hanif, A. (2022). Pengaruh mekanisme good corporate governance terhadap agresivitas pajak. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 14(2), 115–128.
Anggraeni, D., & Fitriyana, R. (2024). Kepemilikan manajerial dan agresivitas pajak. Jurnal Akuntansi, 18(1), 45–58.
Awaloedin, D., & Rahmawati, E. (2022). Pengaruh kepemilikan manajerial terhadap agresivitas pajak. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Perpajakan, 6(2), 89–101.
Chen, S., Chen, X., Lobo, G. J., & Wang, Y. (2018). Tax avoidance and corporate value: Evidence from China. Journal of Contemporary Accounting & Economics, 14(1), 1–17.
Dewi, N., & Oktaviani, R. (2021). Capital intensity dan pengaruhnya terhadap beban pajak perusahaan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 13(1), 67–79.
Fauziyah Nur’Aini. (2023). Praktik penghindaran pajak dalam perspektif manajemen. Jurnal Perpajakan Indonesia, 7(2), 134–147.
Graham, J. R. (2021). Taxes and corporate finance: A review. Journal of Economic Literature, 59(2), 509–565.
Hanum, S. (2023). Ukuran perusahaan dan tarif pajak efektif. Jurnal Akuntansi, 17(3), 201–214.
Karunia, R. L. (2021). Good Corporate Governance (GCG) dan Komite Audit. Bandung: Zurra Infigro Media.
Mallin, C. A. (2022). Corporate Governance (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Ngadiman, N., & Puspitasari, C. (2017). Ukuran perusahaan dan agresivitas pajak. Jurnal Akuntansi, 9(1), 55–66.
Ningsih, S., Irawati, D., Barli, H., & Hidayat, W. (2020). Pajak dan nilai perusahaan. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 12(2), 98–111.
Oktris, L., Kresnawati, E., & Mulya, A. (2021). Kepemilikan manajerial dan agresivitas pajak. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Pajak, 5(2), 120–132.
Rahmayanti, S., Kurnia, S., & Wibawaningsih, E. J. (2021). Peran komite audit terhadap agresivitas pajak. Jurnal Akuntansi, 15(2), 173–185.
Saif‐Alyousfi, A. Y. H. (2025). The relationship between capital intensity and corporate profitability. Economics Journal, 13(11), 324–338.
Solomon, J. (2021). Corporate Governance and Accountability (6th ed.). Wiley.
Spence, M. (1973). Job market signaling. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3), 355–374.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Suita, R. (2019). Peran komite audit dalam tata kelola perusahaan. Jurnal Good Corporate Governance, 4(1), 25–38.
Suyanto. (2022). Ukuran perusahaan dan kinerja keuangan. Jurnal Manajemen, 10(3), 211–223.
Tax Justice Network. (2020). The State of Tax Justice 2020: Tax Justice in the Time of COVID-19. London: Tax Justice Network.
Tim Investopedia. (2021). Signaling theory. Investopedia.
Wiley. (2021). Financial management and capital intensity ratios (Bab tentang capital intensity). Wiley Financial Publishing.
Yuliani, R., & Prastiwi, A. (2021). Komite audit dan agresivitas pajak. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Keuangan, 13(2), 156–168.
Yulyanti, E., & Mujiyati. (2025). Capital intensity dan agresivitas pajak di Indonesia. Jurnal Akuntansi dan Perpajakan, 9(1), 1–14.






