Penerapan ADR dan Potensi Arbitrase dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis di Indonesia

Authors

  • Happy Yulia Anggraeni Universitas Islam Indonesia
  • Praniko Imam Sagita Universitas Islam Indonesia
  • Fane Virginia Yusmana Universitas Islam Indonesia
  • Muhamad Reza Universitas Islam Indonesia
  • Sultan Sehafudin Universitas Islam Indonesia
  • Willy Johan Universitas Islam Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37481/jmh.v5i1.1267

Keywords:

ADR, Arbitration, Mediation, Medical Disputes

Abstract

Medical disputes in Indonesia often face challenges such as lengthy litigation processes, high costs, and low satisfaction among the parties involved. In this context, Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR), particularly mediation and arbitration, offers a more efficient solution. Mediation has been regulated under Law No. 30 of 1999 on Arbitration and Alternative Dispute Resolution as well as Supreme Court Regulation (Perma) No. 1 of 2016. However, arbitration mechanisms still lack a specific legal framework, even though Law No. 17 of 2023 on Health emphasizes the importance of swift and fair dispute resolution in healthcare services. Unlike litigation, arbitration allows for final, expedited, and binding resolutions. Countries such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and Taiwan have successfully implemented arbitration in medical disputes. Taiwan, for instance, has specific regulations that facilitate medical arbitration processes, providing legal certainty for patients and healthcare providers. Indonesia can learn from these international experiences. By clarifying arbitration regulations in the healthcare sector, the government can strengthen a dispute resolution system that is responsive to societal needs. This enhancement can be achieved through the training of professional arbitrators and promoting the use of ADR, ensuring that medical disputes are resolved more fairly, quickly, and cost-effectively.

References

Amirthalingam, K. (2017). Medical dispute resolution, patient safety and the doctor-patient relationship. Singapore Medical Journal, 58(12), 681–684. https://doi.org/10.11622/smedj.2017073

Ardhiyaningrum, F., & Setiawati, D. (2024). Hambatan dan Peluang Efektivitas Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis di Indonesia Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999. Jembatan Hukum : Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial Dan Administrasi Negara, 1(4), 138–153. https://doi.org/10.62383/jembatan.v1i4.1132

Aulia, M. Z. (2018). Hukum Progresif dari Satjipto Rahardjo. Undang: Jurnal Hukum, 1(1), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.1.1.159-185

Blake, S., Browne, J., & Sime, S. (2016). A Practical Approach to Alternative Dispute Resolution. Oxford University Press.

Chia, W.-C., Chen, L.-S., & Wang, S.-T. (2023). The Intra-Hospital Medical Dispute Burden and Capacities: A Nationwide Survey in Taiwan. Healthcare, 11(15), 2121. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11152121

Flori, A., & Yusuf, H. (2024). Perkembangan Hukum Kesehatan Dan Mekanisme Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik. Jurnal Intelek Insan Cendikia, 1(9), Article 9.

Hafizah, H., & Fitriasih, S. (2022). Urgensi Penyelesaian Dugaan Kesalahan Medis Melalui Restorative Justice. JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW, 5(1), 205. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v5i1.4884

Hasbi, H. (2020). Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Pertanahan melalui Proses Mediasi di Badan Pertanahan Kota Makassar. Pleno Jure, 9(1), 36–46. https://doi.org/10.37541/plenojure.v9i1.299

Hsieh, M.-T., Lu, L.-H., Lin, C.-W., & Chen, Y.-W. (2021). Correlation Between Malpractice Litigation and Legislation Reform in Taiwan Over a 30-Year Period. International Journal of General Medicine, Volume 14, 1889–1898. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJGM.S312640

Irawati, A. C. (2022). Mediasi alternative penyelesaian sengketa medik dalam prespektif politik hukum the new normal. Jurnal Lawnesia (Jurnal Hukum Negara Indonesia), 1(1), 42–53.

Iswandari, H. D., & Hoque, S. (2022). Reconceptualizing Legal Arrangement on the Doctor-Patient Relationship in Indonesia. LAW REFORM, 18(1), 58–78. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v18i1.44711

Jauhani, M. A., Putra, R. P., Indraswari, R. P. C., & Saffanah, N. I. (2023). Pemahaman Masyarakat tentang Mediasi Sebagai Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis di Luar Pengadilan. To Maega : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat, 6(1), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.35914/tomaega.v6i1.1292

Kerti, N. G. N. R. M. (2023). The existence and challenges of consumer dispute settlement agency in Indonesia in globalization era. Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science, 3(3), Article 3. https://doi.org/10.55324/ijoms.v3i3.739

Latimer, J., Dowden, C., & Muise, D. (2005). The Effectiveness of Restorative Justice Practices: A Meta-Analysis. The Prison Journal, 85(2), 127–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032885505276969

Muskibah, M. (2018). Arbitrase Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum, 4(2), Article 2.

Mustika, N. W. E., Darma, I. M. W., Kurniawan, I. G. A., & Thapa, N. Y. (2023). Restorative Justice Settles Health Disputes Between Patients and Hospitals from an Inclusive Justice Perspective. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan, 11(3), 423–436.

Nasution, U. P. (2020). Efektivitas Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis (Studi Lapangan Rumah Sakit PKU Muhammadiyah Gamping Sleman). Widya Pranata Hukum : Jurnal Kajian Dan Penelitian Hukum, 2(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.37631/widyapranata.v2i2.263

Nugroho, S. A. (2017). Penyelesaian Sengketa Arbitrase dan Penerapan Hukumnya. Kencana.

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan, Pub. L. No. 1 (2016).

Pitaloka, A., Marjo, M., & Aidi, Z. (2023). The Role of the Indonesian National Arbitration Board (BANI) in the Prevention and Settlement of Business Disputes in Indonesia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainability in Technological, Environmental, Law, Management, Social and Economic Matters, ICOSTELM 2022, 4-5 November 2022, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia. Proceedings of the International Conference on Sustainability in Technological, Environmental, Law, Management, Social and Economic Matters, ICOSTELM 2022, 4-5 November 2022, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia, Bandar Lampung, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.4-11-2022.2328969

Pound, R. (1938). The formative era of American law, by Roscoe Pound. Boston : Little, Brown and Company. https://repository.library.georgetown.edu/handle/10822/713462

Pound, R. (1954). Some Thoughts about Stare Decisis. NACCA Law Journal, 13, 19.

Prakoso, A. L. (2017). Tinjauan Terhadap Arbitrase Syariah Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Di Bidang Perbankan Syariah. Jurnal Jurisprudence, 7(1), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.23917/jurisprudence.v7i1.4356

Prayuti, Y., Lany, A., Takaryanto, D., Hamdan, A. R., Ciptawan, B., & Nugroho, E. A. (2024). Efektivitas Mediasi Dan Arbitrase Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Konsumen Kesehatan. Syntax Idea, 6(3), 1533–1544. https://doi.org/10.46799/syntax-idea.v6i3.3165

Rahadatul ‘Aisy, F. (2022). Efektivitas Perjanjian Arbitrase dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Lisensi Merek Dagang di Indonesia. Jurnal Impresi Indonesia, 1(12), 1266–1272. https://doi.org/10.58344/jii.v1i12.1302

Rahardjo, S. (2010). Penegakan hukum progresif. Penerbit Buku Kompas.

Rosengard, L. A., & Parker, M. (2010). Medical malpractice mediation: A ‘healthy’resolution for patients, doctors and insurance companies. The ADR Advisor, 1–3.

Sisodiya, D. S., & Dwivedi, S. (2023). The Role of ADR in Resolving Disputes Related to Medical Negligence. International Journal of Law and Social Sciences, 34–41.

Sohn, D. H., & Bal, S. B. (2012). Medical Malpractice Reform: The Role of Alternative Dispute Resolution. Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, 470(5), 1370–1378. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-2206-2

Solikhin, R. (2023). Perkembangan dan Urgensi Penerapan Online Dispute Resolution (ODR) dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdagangan Elektronik di Indonesia. Padjadjaran Law Review, 11(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.56895/plr.v11i1.1235

Szmania, S. J., Johnson, A. M., & Mulligan, M. (2008). Alternative dispute resolution in medical malpractice: A survey of emerging trends and practices. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 26(1), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.1002/crq.224

Tjandra, O. C. P. (2021). Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Secara Damai Dalam Kasus Perceraian. SAPIENTIA ET VIRTUS, 6(2), Article 2. https://doi.org/10.37477/sev.v6i2.334

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase dan Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, Pub. L. No. 30 (1999).

Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 17 Tahun 2023 tentang Kesehatan, Pub. L. No. 17 (2023).

Undang-undang (UU) Nomor 36 Tahun 2009 tentang Kesehatan, Pub. L. No. 36 (2009).

Widyanti, S., Pasaribu, D. N. F., Nasution, F. M., Nasution, A. D., Darlian, M. I., & Siregar, H. (2024). Arbitrase Solusi Alternatif Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa. Jurnal Cendikia ISNU SU, 1(2), Article 2.

Zhang, H., Gu, Y., Liang, B., Gao, Y., Zhang, F., & Yun, L. (2024). Eager for an innovative path: Solving the puzzle of medical dispute resolution in China combined with bibliometric analysis. Frontiers in Health Services, 4, 1445536. https://doi.org/10.3389/frhs.2024.1445536

Downloads

Published

2025-01-09

How to Cite

Anggraeni, H. Y., Sagita, P. I., Yusmana, F. V., Reza, M., Sehafudin, S., & Johan, W. (2025). Penerapan ADR dan Potensi Arbitrase dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis di Indonesia. AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Humanis, 5(1), 500–514. https://doi.org/10.37481/jmh.v5i1.1267