Pengaruh Penerapan Kebijakan Akuntansi terhadap Akuntabilitas dalam Mencegah Fraud pada Dinas Peternakan Bangkalan

Authors

  • Nadia Adisti Bernika Juniardi Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
  • Anis Lailatul Fitri Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
  • Rijal Fahmi Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
  • Syaifur Rijal Universitas Trunojoyo Madura
  • Mohamad Djasuli Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37481/jmeb.v4i2.739

Keywords:

Accountability, Fraud, Accounting Policy, Bangkalan Livestock Service

Abstract

Transparency and fraud prevention are important principles in the financial system. This second principle guarantees legal certainty and increases the level of legitimacy in the decision-making process, because openness in the financial system becomes more expected by the public. Accountability and fraud prevention policies are very important for various organizations to have, especially public institutions today. One of the efforts made to create accountability and prevent fraud is through appropriate accounting policies.    This research was conducted with a qualitative descriptive research design. The data collection method used in this research is semi-structured interviews and observation. The accounting policy implemented by the Bangkalan livestock service applies the principles of accountability, transparency and fraud prevention. It can be concluded that the accounting policy implemented by the Bangkalan livestock service has an effect on accountability and prevention. hoax.

References

Arifin, J. (2020). Fraud, Mendeteksi dan Mengatasinya (Pendekatan Akuntansi Forensik & Audit Investigatif). EKONESIA.

Bernitz, U., Nergelius, J., Cardner, C., & Groussot, X. (2008). General Principles of EC Law in a Process of Development. Kluwer Law International.

Bijsterveld, S. van. (2004). TRANSPARENCY IN THE EUROPEAN UNION: A CRUCIAL LINK IN SHAPING THE NEW SOCIAL CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITIZEN AND THE EU.

Bröhmer, J. (2004). Transparenz als Verfassungsprinzip - Grundgesetz and Europäische Union (Vol. 106). Mohr Siebeck.

Cressey, D. R. (1953). Other people’s money; a study of the social psychology of embezzlement.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). RESEARCH DESIGN Qualitative, Quantitative. and Mixed Methods Approaches (2nd ed.). Sage Publications.

Curtin, D., & Meijer, A. J. (2006). Does transparency strengthen legitimacy? https://doi.org/10.3233/IP-2006-0091

Dwiyanto, A. (2008). Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Pubik. Gadjahmada University Press.

Foucault, M. (1979). Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison.

Gay, L. R., & Airasian, P. W. (2003). Educational Research: Competencies for Analysis and Applications (7th ed.). Merrill/Prentice Hall.

Grant, R. W., & Keohane, R. O. (2005). Accountability and Abuses of Power in World Politics. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055405051476

Halim, A. (2008). Akuntansi keuangan daerah akuntansi sektor publik Abdul Halim.

Kalkhouran, A. A. N., Rasid, S. Z. A., Sofian, S., & Nedaei, B. H. N. (2015). A Conceptual Framework for Assessing the Use of Strategic Management Accounting in Small and Medium Enterprises. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 35(1), 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/joe.21644

Lipovetsky, G. (1992). Le crépuscule de devoir: L’éthique indolore des nouveaux temps démocratiques.

Locke, E. A. (2005). Why emotional intelligence is an invalid concept. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(4), 425–431. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.318

Mitchell, M. L., & Jolley, J. M. (2010). Research Design Explained (7th ed.). Wadsworth.

Mulyadi. (2013). Sistem Akuntansi (3rd ed.). Salemba Empat.

Normanton, E. L. (1966). The Accountability and Audit of Governments.

Paranoan, N., Tandungan, E. S., & Sipi, A. D. S. (2018). Efektivitas Pengendalian Internal, Kepuasan Kerja, dan Kecenderungan Kecurangan Akuntansi. Jurnal Akun Nabelo, 1.

Pill, J. S., Clayton, M. M., Skalak, S. L., & Golden, T. W. (2006). A Guide to Forensic Accounting Investigation (1st ed.).

Plattner, M. F., Diamond, L. D., & Schedler, A. (1999). The self-restraining state: Power and accountability in new democracies. Journal of Democracy, 14.

Prasetio, A. B., & Efend, D. (2022). ANALISIS KUALITAS PELAYANAN PUBLIK DAN SPI DALAM PENCEGAHAN FRAUD PADA PDAM DELTA TIRTA KABUPATEN SIDOARJO . Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset Akuntansi, Vol 11 No 8.

Purwanda, E., & Harahap, E. A. (2017). PENGARUH AKUNTABILITAS DAN KOMPETENSI TERHADAP KUALITAS AUDIT (Survey Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Bandung). Jurnal Akuntansi, 19(3), 357. https://doi.org/10.24912/ja.v19i3.85

Rezaee, Z. (2005). Causes, consequences, and deterence of financial statement fraud. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(3), 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1045-2354(03)00072-8

Trisakti, F., Dikeu Dewi Berliana, A., Bukhori, A., Fitri, A., & Sunan Gunung Djati Bandung, U. (2021). TRANSPARANSI DAN KEPENTINGAN UMUM. In Jurnal DIALEKTIKA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial (Vol. 19, Issue 1). http://jurnaldialektika.com

Zamzam, I., Mahdi, S. A., & Ansar, R. (2017). Pengaruh Diamond Fraud Dan Tingkat Religiuitas Terhadap Kecurangan Akademik (Studi Pada Mahasiswa S-1 di Lingkungan Perguruan Tinggi se Kota Ternate). Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Peradaban, 3.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-01

How to Cite

Juniardi, N. A. B., Fitri, A. L., Fahmi, R., Rijal, S., & Djasuli, M. (2024). Pengaruh Penerapan Kebijakan Akuntansi terhadap Akuntabilitas dalam Mencegah Fraud pada Dinas Peternakan Bangkalan . AKADEMIK: Jurnal Mahasiswa Ekonomi &Amp; Bisnis, 4(2), 463–476. https://doi.org/10.37481/jmeb.v4i2.739